Atty., S.D. The jury found appellant guilty of armed robbery of the Citizens National Bank in Plain, Mississippi. The jury found appellant guilty of armed robbery of the Citizens National Bank in Plain, Mississippi. U. S. The jury found appellant guilty of armed robbery of the Citizens National Bank in Plain, Mississippi.
The appellant was brought into the courtroom while handcuffed and went directly to the counsel table where the cuffs were removed. Albert Kenneth Bankston, appellant, was convicted in the district court for violation of Sections 2113(a) and (d), Title 18, U.S.C. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. They drugged and pacified their victims with PCP, walking around with cardboard on their feet so they wouldn’t leave footprints.
The trial judge was familiar with the appellant's background2 and had instructed the U. S. Marshal's office to use whatever restraints were considered necessary in handling the prisoner and in transporting him to and from the courtroom.
W. E. Gore, Jr., Jackson, Miss. v. Attys., Robert E. Hauberg, U. S.
The most recent sighting of Bishop was on September 19, 1994 in Basel, Switzerland, by a neighbor. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. Aided in testimony by his pal Dan Dugan, a gentleman reposing in a Texan prison, Bankston happily squealed in exchange for being moved to a small town jail.
1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I. Albert Kenneth Bankston, appellant, was convicted in the district court for violation of Sections 2113(a) and (d), Title 18, U.S.C. In 2010 it was revealed that before the murders Bishop had been corresponding with federal prison inmate Albert Kenneth Bankston in United States Penitentiary, Marion, though it is unknown why or how. 511, 170 So.2d 428 (1965), wherein this Court held: There is no merit in Bankston's contention that prosecution upon the State charge of armed robbery in violation of Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 2367 (1956) unconstitutionally exposed him to double jeopardy. 30114. The court found from the record that the victim had previously identified appellant from ten photographs on the day following the robbery, and that two other bank employees also identified appellant from photographs as the bank robber. [citing cases]". Assuming appellant had standing to object to the claimed unlawful search under Jeffers3 , his total reliance on Chimel v. California, 1969, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S. Ct. 2034, 23 L. Ed. The appellant is attacking his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. In that case, the Court, speaking from United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959). Filed: Albert Kenneth Bankston has appealed from the district court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate his judgment of conviction and sentence.
On appeal, Bankston's principal contention is that his conviction of the offense against the United States barred his subsequent prosecution in the Rankin County Circuit Court for the offense against the State of Mississippi based upon the same unlawful act and that his trial in the latter court unconstitutionally exposed him to double jeopardy contrary to Mississippi Constitution, Article 3, section 22 (1890) and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The court determined that appellant had not been prejudiced by the handcuffing and that trial before a new and uninfected panel was not required by the circumstances. Reversal is urged upon two grounds requiring discussion: (1) that the trial court erred in overruling appellant's motion to quash the jury venire when appellant was brought into the courtroom at the opening of his trial in the presence of the jury venire wearing handcuffs; and further (2) that the court erroneously admitted evidence obtained from a search of an apartment occupied by one Toni Gentry, appellant's female traveling companion.
The jury found appellant guilty of armed robbery of the Citizens National Bank in Plain, Mississippi. Albert Kenneth Bankston, appellant, was convicted in the district court for violation of Sections 2113(a) and (d), Title 18, U.S.C. The appellant is attacking his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. Because, in the view of the Maryland Court of Appeals, both the grand and petit juries had been unconstitutionally selected, the case was remanded to the trial court. Robert E. Hauberg, U.S.
Airport Grove Corp. Of Polk County, and Other Related Corpor... John Emory Simon v. The M/v Hialeah, Her Engines, Tackle, Ap... Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New Yor... National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen... Ernesto A. Miranda v. State of Arizona. Albert Kenneth Bankston, appellant, was convicted in the district court for violation of Sections 2113(a) and (d), Title 18, U.S.C.