The provided example is a normative economic statement because it mirrors value judgments. Normative economics statements are rigid and prescriptive in nature. Public economics studies the effects of the public sector on society and the economy as a whole. It strongly deals with facts and data.

It evaluates situations and outcomes of economic behavior as morally good or bad. Positive economics, on the other hand, concerns itself with only stating facts and figures. Here's an example of a positive economic statement: "Government-provided healthcare increases public expenditures." © 2020 - EDUCBA. The statement is not possible to test as the data are not available because those are based on a different philosophy, moral values, etc. Then the results are required to be extracted and tallied with the budgeted figures. Amartya Sen – Amartya Sen is a 20th-century Indian economist and a Nobel laureate. In contrast, positive economics are objective, cause and effect statements which do not include a value judgment. Normative economics is based on values and therefore inherently subjective. The rich should pay a much higher income tax. Positive economics is the study of economics based on objective analysis of what is occurring and what has been occurring in an economy. This part of Economics deals with values, judgments, and opinions. THE CERTIFICATION NAMES ARE THE TRADEMARKS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. Normative Economics vs. Many normative (value) judgments, however, are held conditionally, to be given up if facts or knowledge of facts changes, so that a change of values may be purely scientific. No portion of this site may be copied or distributed by any means, including electronic distribution without the express written consent of Higher Rock Education and Learning, Inc. the way an economy should work under ideal circumstances. Positive economics is the study of economics based on objective analysis of what is occurring and what has been occurring in an economy.

Positive economy relates to the causes and effects of an economy. Positive and normative economics are often synthesized in the style of practical idealism. Positive economics, being the measurable perspective, helps policymakers and other government and business authorities decide on important matters that affect particular policies under the guidance of fact-based findings.

In contrast, positive economics is concerned with "what is." A monopoly is a market with a single seller (called the monopolist) but many buyers. The current demand-supply situation, the preferences of the masses, the change in the real course of action by the government and the actual results of the actions which were taken were captured under positive economics. The law of supply is a basic principle in economics that asserts that, assuming all else being constant, an increase in the price of goods will have a corresponding direct increase in the supply thereof.

Going back to positive economics we can now see the major difference between the two approaches. Paired with positive economics, normative economics can branch into many opinion-based solutions that mirror how an individual or one whole community portrays particular economic projects. Positive economics is objective and fact-based where the statements are precise, descriptive, and clearly measurable. It captures the consumer or the mass sentiment and the consequences. normative economics: Study of economics that attempts to determine desirability (or undesirability) of different economic conditions, programs, or situations by asking, "what should or ought to be." Related to: Positive economy relates to the causes and effects of an economy. Thus this is the general theory of the country.