They invent industrial processes that economize on scarce inputs, find substitutes, purchase energy-efficient equipment when energy prices are rising, and so forth. Dependency on the side of humans on the natural environment’s ecosystems to provide support for human social system. One may imagine human consequences as the output of a matrix of scenarios. processes would become disastrous to human societies and how humans make trade-offs between gains and losses in hazardous environment, which leads to the third objective; (3) Evaluate current natural hazard mitigation. Joining together all combinations of one scenario from each set, and adding assumptions about people's immediate responses, would generate an extensive set of grand scenarios. Moreover, the mitigation efforts may themselves set in motion undesired changes. So, for example, an estimate of the number of homes that would be inundated by a one-meter rise in sea level and the associated loss of life and property may be useful for alerting decision makers to potentially important issues, but it should not be taken as a prediction, because humans always react. We begin by developing the concept of human consequences and showing why, to understand them, it is critical to understand the variety of human responses to global change. The impact-assessment tradition involves projecting the human consequences of a range of natural-environment scenarios under given assumptions about human response. Humans learned that if a forest was cleared of undergrowth, it was easier to hunt for animals in the forest. 5. --the future of social and economic organization. We offer only limited discussion of how future global change might proximally affect what humans value, because the variety of possible global changes and the uncertainty about the effects of each make it far too difficult to go into detail. Better policy options may lie on the horizon.
Some mitigative action is fully justified on other grounds. (NPR) The climate of most of Australia is still arid. We offer the following rough distinctions among types of interventions. We consider the following analytic distinctions useful for thinking about the range of responses available. Deliberate Responses Versus Actions with Incidental Effects. Coordinated Versus Uncoordinated Responses. Response to global change may be coordinated, as through the policies of governments or trade associations aimed at eliciting the same action from many actors, or uncoordinated, as with independent actions of households or small firms. Communities began building commercial economies, in which production was performed for profit and trade with other countries. It is in the nature of exponential growth processes that the earlier the growth rate decreases, the greater the final effect. more toward a domination of people over the environment. To project or forecast the human consequences of global change at some point in the relatively distant future, one would need to know at least the following: --the future state of the natural environment. Some important and meaningful tradeoffs can be made on economic grounds, for instance, between investing in renewable energy development and in directly limiting the burning of fossil fuels. It is wise to insure against disaster. (8) The same principle probably also applies to human adjustments to major environmental change. Case analyses of past social conflicts can be used to assess hypotheses drawn from such analytic frameworks. Action now is more feasible and effective than action later. Building these scenarios, identifying the most probable ones, and assessing their outcomes would be an overwhelming analytic task. water diversion, LiDAR, exhumed forest, weather balloon, tree coring, satellite image, bicycle in SF. Therefore, we recommend increased empirical research, including both field studies and laboratory-simulation studies, to clarify the sources and structures of particular environmental conflicts and to test the efficacy of alternative techniques for their resolution and institutions for their management. While humans have accepted this view of environmentalism for the Holocene epoch, political environmentalist Paul Wapner proposes a renewed definition of environmentalism that has emerged in the Anthropocene epoch.
(7). Technology has impacted families negatively by creating, flow of information in the family (Correa 123). Human Consequences and Responses They can intervene in human systems (type H) and indirectly control the proximate causes, by investing in research on renewable energy technologies to replace fossil fuel or providing tax incentives for more compact settlements to lower demand for transportation.