Fish (n) eat (v). Fish fish fish eat eat. but how can that be? "Fish that fish eat eat." This is a simple sentence. @nnnnnn: Hah! This logic can be applied again, this time modifying the modifier of the original subject of the clause - this time, clarifying that the subject of the phrase 'fish eat' aren't merely eaten by other fish: they are eaten by fish that are in turn preyed upon by other fish. Is the verb 'fish' ever used for fish as agents? Alex jerked the pole, setting the hook, and then glanced at her as the fish fought for freedom. -- Noun phrase. You eat [fish (eaten by fish) that eats fish]. rev 2020.9.28.37683, Sorry, we no longer support Internet Explorer, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, English Language & Usage Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. “Is your dog a dog dog, of more of a loner?” Here, the speaker alludes to the common expression dog person or cat person, and invites the listener to respond in a similar tone. The statements you've made are not grammatical. The repetition gives emphasis and a sense of repeated action. To prove how grammatically correct 'fish fish fish eat eat eat' is, we start with a simple clause: fish eat.
@einpoklum The format you've reverted to got you 4 downvotes and 3 close votes.
How to use fish in a sentence.
It’s “one fish is” and “two fish are”, unless you are talking about several species of fish; then it would be correct to say, for example “the diversity of the reef’s fishes is threatened by human activity”. @Jaekelopterus, Fish (that) fish eat... is not a phrase, but a clause. "Fish that fish eat, eat." Is there some sort of giant grammar encyclopaedia that can tell us if nesting has a limit? Consider the following sequence of (supposed) sentences: If you've accepted all of the above, then surely you must conclude that: "Fish fish fish eat eat eat" is a grammatically correct sentence in English. It's a noun phrase. Is it harm if i chose to drive 2WD mode for my 4WD Renault Duster specifically when i am driving in the city. But, do as you wish ... @einpoklum So, what is your question? The close vote reason that 3 people picked is: I'm voting to close this because it's nonsense. How does light which is an electromagnetic wave carry information? For example, both of the following sentences are grammatically correct: Note to English learners: notice that I’ve written “stink” instead of “stinks”. to receive a weekly summary of new articles, Follow me to get updates and engage in a discussion, You can use the image on another website, provided that you, guide on how to avoid the most common mistakes. However I don't necessarily think that grammar makes much theoretical sense most of the time, especially in English. more confusing, but still valid.
These are theoretically valid sentences, but are very hard to parse and therefore are unacceptable to most people.